PIL Against the Statue in the Ocean

To the Chief Justice,
Hon. High Court of Mumbai,

First, we'd like to say that we mean no disrespect to the memory of
Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, who was a truly great and able King.

Having said that, we feel that the proposed statue/memorial to be
built in the image of this great and able King, estimated to cost
Rs.350 crores, is an unnecessary expense for the exchequer of the
Government of Maharashtra.

As we all know, there has been a vastly insufficient monsoon, and on
date, if we're not mistaken, 27 districts in Maharashtra have been, or
will soon be declared drought-hit. Starving Maharashtrian farmers,
committing suicide has already been a matter of grave concern for the
Government of the state. Surely, these funds could be better utilised
saving some of these lives and livelihoods.

We also have, within Mumbai itself, a vast number of infrastructural
difficulties, that need huge investments to be sorted out. The rapidly
declining availability of potable water and usable power is a huge
problem, for example.

The roads in our financial capital are a national disgrace. We could
fix some of them.

We could certainly do with more schools/colleges, providing education
to the underprivileged at no cost. These could all be named in memory
of Chhatrapati Shivaji.

Another possible avenue for the use of surplus funds would be to
strengthen and better equip our Police Force and Coast Guard. In light
of the terrorist attacks on Mumbai last year, it is crucial to
strengthen these arms of Government, as our security and our lives
depend on them.

We have all studied the history of this great state. We are all
Mumbaikars and Maharashtrians, and the state would possibly not exist
in it's current form without the far-reaching and visionary
administrative abilities of Chhatrapati Shivaji. Since the proposed
statue/memorial is in the name of a ruler famous for this
administrative ability, we owe it to his memory to ask if he himself
would approve of such wasteful expediture in a drought year,
especially when the city's defences are not at full strength?

We'd also like to point out that in light of a track record of
consistent cost over-runs and delays leading to price escalations in
major construction projects undertaken by the Government, it is
unlikely that the amount to be spent towards such a project will
actually be limited to just Rs.350 Crores.

We, as concerned citizens of India and Maharashtra, and as Bombayites,
Mumbaikars, Bambaiwallahs, pray that such a monument be disallowed,
and the funds used for the benefit of the public, by taxing whom these
funds have been generated.

We also pray that, if after addressing
citizens-welfare/development/infrastructure issues, Maharashtra
actually has such surplus funding, it be handed to a committee of
eminent citizens who have by past action proved their concern for and
commitment to the greater good of the citizens of Mumbai. These
members may be selected at the discretion of the Hon. Court or by a
popular poll, as the Hon. Court sees fit.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Vishal M. Dadlani, and the undersigned.



After you have added your name to this petition an e-mail will be sent to the given address to confirm your signature. Please make sure that your e-mail address is correct or you will not receive this e-mail and your name will not be counted.

Some friends have pointed out that the confirmation email landed up in their spam folders. Please check your spam folders also in case you haven't received your confirmation email for a while.

Thanks again!
Name:

E-mail address:

Please enter an optional comment:

Do not display name on website:

Last 20 of 22087 signatories

xxxxxxxx,

Sricharan, Mumbai,
"I am against the statue, if they are so bent upon let them use the party funds which they spend on rigging the votes"

DS Ranga Rao,
"No government has any right to squander the public funds on erecting statues for the departed leaders. Instead, it should spend it on poverty-alleviation programmes."

xxxxxxxx,

Niranjan Puthal,

Sandeep Mestry,
"I completely agree with you Vishal and you have all my support and backing in this matter. I, personally value Shivaji Raje a lot, he has always been a true and great King. However, such staue is not needed at this moment cosnidering various issues and deficiencies being faced by us."

Vara,
"Well done Vishal. We need gutsy crusaders like you to raise a voice. "

Suprio Bose,
"Ironically an Indian version of the Statue of Liberty being promoted by the very people who are crusading against its Liberty !!!!"

Mahesh Sinha,

Vikas Singh,

xxxxxxxx,

hussaindhariwala,

MUKESH KUMAR,
"well done vishal!!"

xxxxxxxx,
"oh almighty! please instill a sense of responsibility into these politicians and make them realise their priority."

avishek goenka,

shreeyash,
"I agree with vishal sir completely."

Nishant M Sharma,

Mohit Kukreja,
"If Mumbai takes pride along with places like Delhi and others that its not yet anarchic like UP and Bihar, this should sail through smoothly, but I doubt it. Give those farmers some relief certainly but only to the deserving. I dont know why every other road and institute in India has to be named after gandhi, nehru etc."

Amol,
"I suggest to read the history before writing anything related to Shivaji Maharaj and commenting on this article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shivaji . I feel sorry when Shivaji Maharaj is confined to Maharashtra and Marathi. History would have been different without Shivaji Maharaj, who stand against all the Mugals and foreign forces. The monument will be pride and bust the self respect amongst the peoples of this land, which is really very much needed at this point of globalization. Learn who you are first, respect your culture, be proud of who your. Admire other culture and take best out of everything dont just follow blindly. 350 crores is nothing for Maharashtra, we have strong history of education and good infrastructure. And even the richest countries in world have there own problems, so putting this money in public wont solve those problems. Defenately not the way the comments suggest about better utilization of money. "

Parimal jagdishbhai hodar,